My final project is going to be about the Water Cycle. I chose the Water
Cycle because it was a topic that I actually had to teach about during my
teacher assisting placement for my Unit on Earth’s Systems and Interactions.
When I was teaching the Water Cycle to my 6th graders, I felt like
it would be a good fit for the technology integrated lesson plan because there
are a lot of components that would be learned by students much better in a more
visual and interactive setting that technology can provide. Many of these “cycles”
such as the rock cycle and water cycle can be hard for students to interpret
when just reading about it. Therefore, I think it is important that for these
challenging topics we provide means for students to work hands on with the
concepts and create meaningful projects for authentic audiences. Incorporating technology
into these experiences can both empower and transform student learning.
The outline of my lesson plan includes introductions to the water cycle, explanations
of the water cycle via online virtual and interactive labs and a final project
presentation of a Rube Goldberg Machine Screencast modeling the water cycle. To
begin frontloading for this unit, I will use Padlet and some pictures of
landscapes to get students thinking about the different places and phases in which
water can be found. I will then move into using some interactive Water Cycle
labs from both “Earth Guide” and a Weebly page. This will hopefully accommodate
all levels of learners by allowing students to work at their own pace, have
interactive visuals and have sound options. The final project will be a group
project with pairings made based on pre-test scores to allow those who are similarly
minded to work together. This project requires collaboration in order to make a
final screencast project that is a Rube Goldberg Machine whose components represent
different parts of the Water Cycle. Different teams, based on the different
tiers of students, will have varying project requirements in order to modify
the project in a way to accommodate all levels of learners. I think using the
screencast for the final project will require an extra degree of collaboration
and group interaction that a poster does not require, thus meeting the
technology standard stating that “students will contribute constructively to
project teams, assuming various roles and responsibilities to work effectively
toward a common goal” (ISTE Global Collaborator 7C) while also meeting the NGSS
requirements for developing a model representing the Water Cycle.
Assessment
Plan
Objective
|
Formative Assessment
|
Technology Used
|
1 & 2
|
Water
Cycle Diagram Pre-Test
|
Online
Virtual Lab Quiz
|
2
|
Where can
I find water?
|
Padlet
|
1
|
Bunsen
Burner Demo
|
Google
Forms
|
1 & 2
|
Interactive
Water Cycle Activity
|
Google Doc
Submission
|
1 & 2
|
Water
Cycle Review
|
Quizlet
Live
|
Objective
|
Summative Assessment
|
Technology Used
|
1, 2 &
3
|
Rube
Goldberg Project
|
Webquest
and Screencast
|
1 & 2
|
Water
Cycle Quiz
|
Google
Forms
|
Below is a figure that shows an example of the beginnings of a Rube Goldberg Machine.
I think you have great ideas! I agree that the "cycles" are often hard for students to visualize, and technology could really help them in these areas. You are very organized an have a good plan already laid out :) I like that you start out with simple technology such as Padlet and work into more involved technology later on. I also am going to try using Google Forms. They look so easy to use, but I have never made one.
ReplyDeleteYeah google forms are great! Especially when you want to quickly assess or collect data about a lesson or assginment because you can collect all the students' answers in an excell spreadsheet.
ReplyDeleteCourtney, I really like how you account for students different levels. Sometimes I think it's beneficial to have lower level students work with higher level students to bring them up to pace, but I think it's equally important to keep like minded students together, especially when the topic is something a little more challenging. This unit does seem to lend itself well to technology and I like that they're not just using the same one over and over. Do your students stay on task with something like this or do you have to monitor them for playing games or something else instead? My 7th graders are always trying to sneak games when we use Chromebooks in class.
ReplyDeleteAngela, honestly most of my kids are pretty good at staying on task in regards to using their Chromebooks and technology. What I have to get on them more about is keeping their conversations focused. There are always the kids that get off task; however, I have found that if I clearly lay out my expectations for the hour and circulate the class that tends to help. I'm sure these are things that you do as well, so it may be a difference in student population. I have 6th graders, and I guess I have learned the few that like to use their Chromebooks inappropriately and monitor them more closely.
ReplyDelete