A common educational belief is the act of holding children back also referred to as grade retention. Grade retention is keeping a student back for another year in the same grade because the student is not keeping up with or accomplishing the curriculum requirements for that grade. The idea is that holding them back will give them more time to master the material before moving on instead of just automatically granting them social promotion. However, this brings me to the question of is grade retention actually of benefit to the student, long term or short term? I question this because it is of such large cost in time and money for both the student and the school. Consequently, there ought to be empirical evidence supporting schools’ decisions to consider grade retention over social promotion.
My initial opinion was
that it would be more of a long term negative effect on the student over a
positive one if he or she experienced grade retention. According to Martin (2011),
both early and recent research has concluded that grade retention has largely
negative outcomes. There have been a lot of studies that have shown that grade
retention is highly correlated with poorer academic achievement and low
involvement in post-high school education (Martin, 2011). Furthermore, studies
have shown that a higher dropout rate is seen among students that are held back
because it appears students actually learn more if promoted (Deschenes, 2001). In
fact, the dropout rates among students that are held back
are usually higher than those that were promoted even though they exhibited low academic achievement as well. A study was conducted including data from 3,261
high school students and they found that even after considering the various
demographic factors among the participants, there were statistically
significant effects of grade retention on the students (Martin, 2011). Areas
studied were self-concept, homework completion, motivation and amount of school
absences (Martin, 2011). Martin’s (2011) study showed that these factors were negatively
affected by grade retention, along with decreased self-esteem among students
that were held back; however, peer relationships did not appear to be statistically
affected.
Other studies have also found negative effects on student academic performance, post-grade retention. For example, Vandecandelaere et. al. (2016), found that when retained in first grade, students' math scores were affected even more negatively than in if retained after kindergarten. This suggests to me that maybe the older the students get, the worse the effects of grade retention. Lastly, some research has supported that short term students that are held back may illustrate positive effects because at first they feel advantaged in a sense because they are older than the other students and may have some prior experience with the material. Nevertheless, these “advantages” only appear short term and then disappear (Klapproth et. al., 2016). When talking to my Cooperating Teacher about the topic of grade retention, he said they generally don't hold students back in their middle school; however, he can think of a few students that were held back and when they got to high school a majority of them actually dropped out and did not come back. We also discussed the influence of parents on grade retention and he said from his experience it seems the parents usually push more for the student to be held back then the school does. He said that he can maybe see the short term effects of grade retention being seen as positive but overall he said "I am not a strong proponent of grade retention as I am not sure that it is actually of benefit to the student long term, especially once they are in middle school or older. I could see holding a student back in kindergarten or first grade potentially being helpful for the student, but after that I would say social promotion is ultimately a better way to go."
Other studies have also found negative effects on student academic performance, post-grade retention. For example, Vandecandelaere et. al. (2016), found that when retained in first grade, students' math scores were affected even more negatively than in if retained after kindergarten. This suggests to me that maybe the older the students get, the worse the effects of grade retention. Lastly, some research has supported that short term students that are held back may illustrate positive effects because at first they feel advantaged in a sense because they are older than the other students and may have some prior experience with the material. Nevertheless, these “advantages” only appear short term and then disappear (Klapproth et. al., 2016). When talking to my Cooperating Teacher about the topic of grade retention, he said they generally don't hold students back in their middle school; however, he can think of a few students that were held back and when they got to high school a majority of them actually dropped out and did not come back. We also discussed the influence of parents on grade retention and he said from his experience it seems the parents usually push more for the student to be held back then the school does. He said that he can maybe see the short term effects of grade retention being seen as positive but overall he said "I am not a strong proponent of grade retention as I am not sure that it is actually of benefit to the student long term, especially once they are in middle school or older. I could see holding a student back in kindergarten or first grade potentially being helpful for the student, but after that I would say social promotion is ultimately a better way to go."
Overall, I have determined that personally and
based on evidence, grade retention is a common educational belief and practice
that is not founded in evidence. It appears that grade retention long term does
not benefit the student, and the net effects of being held back are highly
negative. In discussion with peers I have heard many differing views on grade
retention, and majorities were in favor of grade retention. From personal
experience, one of my friends was held back in middle school and she end up
dropping out of high school and then later getting her GED. Consequently, if I was
having a conversation with someone with an opposing, non-evidence based opinion
to mine regarding grade retention, I would politely refute them and point them
to the studies that I have read about. I would also outline factors such as
dropout rates, self-concept, school absences and homework completion and how they
are negatively influenced by grade retention.
References:
Deschenes S., Tyack D., & Cuban L. (2001).
Mistmatch: Historical Perspective on Schools and Students Who Don’t Fit Them.Teachers
College Record, V. 103, N. 4p. 525-547.
Martin,
A. J. (2011). Holding back and holding behind: Grade retention and students'
non-academic and academic outcomes. British
Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 739-763
Vandecandelaere,
M., Vansteelandt, S., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2016). The effects of
early grade retention: Effect modification by prior achievement and age. Journal of School Psychology, 54, 77-93.
Klapproth, F., Schaltz, P., Brunner, M.,
Keller, U., Fischbach, A., Ugen, S., & Martin, R. (2016). Short-term and
medium-term effects of grade retention in secondary school on academic
achievement and psychosocial outcome variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 182-194.
Great post and original topic!
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you from having a family member held back in kindergarten growing up. He was (and is) highly gifted, which, if one understands gifted traits, means he was behind in emotional maturity, which is completely normal for gifted, yet also the reason he was held back. He did not turn in work and did not go on to college and it negatively effected his self-esteem. Yet, I have never read studies on it.
It makes total sense to me! Gifted students who are denied grade acceleration when they need it, also have higher drop out rates, it impacts their motivation level for school performance and affects them long term (see A Nation Deceived studies) which is also keeping them in a lower grade than needed. Bravo! Let's keep moving them forward while providing extra academic support where needed.
It is interesting to me that you have had similar, supporting experiences to the research as I have. I wonder why it seems so many people in my classes are for grade retention when it seems to not actually benefit the student according to research.
ReplyDeleteI love your opinion and the research you use! Nice job building your argument Courntney! I do wonder what the impact of not employing grade retention would be. For instance, would we have to readjust our education system to be based on what a student's strengths and weaknesses are as opposed to their age? This concept has always intrigued me and seems to correlate with your general philosophy in regards to grade retention. Either way, I agree that being "held back" rarely, if ever seems to encourage students.
ReplyDeleteI feel as if we did reevaluate our educational system and it was more focused on skills than content knowledge then maybe this could make a difference. I personally believe that "smart" is such an irrelevant term when it comes to school because everyone is "smart" in their own way. For example, I might be really good at biology and another person is really good at farming, cooking or theater. So if grade retention is employed, I believe it should be on the merits of skills, strengths and weaknesses like you had mentioned. Not merely on the fact because they weren't "smart" at math and science and failed those classes. I say this because in my current placement I have students that are really struggling with science. They always say they aren't good at science or they aren't "smart;" however, I just try to tell them everyone is good or "smart" in a different way but that doesn't mean you can't at least try to do well in class.
ReplyDelete